Yerima Shettima’s Capacity Movement: A Collective Endeavor for Change in Kaduna Central

By Abdul-Azeez Suleiman

BTvNEWS: In the realm of political dynamics, movements serve as vital conduits for societal change, embodying the collective aspirations of a populace yearning for reform. The upcoming 2027 elections in Nigeria, particularly the candidacy of Yerima Shettima for the Kaduna Central Senatorial District under the All Progressives Congress (APC), exemplify this phenomenon. The Capacity Movement, which has garnered momentum in support of Shettima, encapsulates the essence of a political movement—an organized effort aimed at altering government policy and social values in response to perceived inadequacies within the status quo.

Political movements, by their very nature, are often reactions against established norms and practices. The Capacity Movement is no exception; it arises from a collective realization among the citizens of Kaduna Central that their needs and aspirations have been inadequately addressed by existing political structures. This movement, therefore, is not merely a campaign for a political candidate but a broader call for systemic change, reflecting the frustrations and hopes of millions who seek representation and accountability.

Understanding the Capacity Movement through the lens of political theory enhances our appreciation of its significance. The political opportunity theory posits that movements flourish in response to favorable political conditions. In the case of Shettima’s candidacy, the current socio-political environment in Nigeria—characterized by disillusionment with traditional political elites and a demand for fresh leadership—provides fertile ground for the movement’s emergence. Citizens are increasingly seeking representatives who resonate with their experiences and can articulate their aspirations.

Conversely, the resource mobilization theory emphasizes the importance of strategic organization and resource allocation in the success of political movements. The Capacity Movement has adeptly leveraged social media, grassroots mobilization, and community engagement to rally support for Shettima. This strategic approach not only amplifies the movement’s message but also fosters a sense of ownership among supporters, who are empowered to participate actively in the political process.

While the Capacity Movement is distinct from the APC as a political party, the two are intertwined in their objectives. Political movements often serve as catalysts for the formation of political parties, as seen in historical examples across the globe. The transition from a movement to a party can provide a platform for the issues championed by the movement to gain institutional recognition and influence. In this context, Shettima’s candidacy can be viewed as a bridge between the grassroots aspirations of the Capacity Movement and the formal mechanisms of governance represented by the APC.

Political movements, unlike political parties, typically focus on a singular issue or set of issues. The Capacity Movement’s primary objective is to advocate for effective representation and responsive governance in Kaduna Central. By concentrating on this core issue, the movement is able to mobilize a diverse coalition of supporters united by a shared vision for change. This focus is critical in distinguishing the movement from the broader agenda of the APC, which encompasses a wide array of political concerns.

The Capacity Movement’s support for Yerima Shettima represents a significant shift in the political space of Kaduna Central. It underscores a growing demand for citizen engagement and accountability in governance. As political scientists Santos and Mercea note, the rise of movement parties has disrupted traditional party politics, fostering new avenues for political mobilization. The Capacity Movement embodies this transformation, as it encourages citizens to actively participate in shaping their political destiny rather than relegating their voices to the margins of electoral politics.

Moreover, the movement’s emphasis on grassroots mobilization and community involvement reflects a broader trend in which citizens are increasingly seeking alternatives to conventional political engagement. The Capacity Movement exemplifies how social movements can serve as effective vehicles for policy advocacy and societal change, often yielding results that surpass the efforts of formal political structures. This is particularly relevant in the context of Nigeria, where high barriers to entry in political competition can disenfranchise many potential candidates and their constituents.

The Capacity Movement for Yerima Shettima’s candidacy in the 2027 elections is a testament to the power of collective action in the pursuit of political change. It illustrates how grassroots movements can galvanize support for candidates who are perceived as capable of addressing the pressing issues faced by their constituents. As the movement continues to evolve, it serves not only as a platform for Shettima but as a broader call for accountability, representation, and reform in Kaduna Central.

In a political environment often marred by disillusionment, the Capacity Movement stands as a beacon of hope, demonstrating that through collective effort, citizens can challenge the status quo and advocate for a future that aligns with their aspirations. As the elections approach, the movement’s impact will undoubtedly shape the political discourse, reminding us of the enduring significance of citizen engagement in the democratic process.